Abbott Hot to Pull Out

In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision to dismantle parts of Texas’s razor-wire barrier, a fierce debate rages. Many Texans see this as an infringement on state rights, intensifying calls for “Texit” amidst a backdrop of contentious immigration policies and border control issues.
A vintage photo of a man next to a modern photo of another man with the phrase 'Here We Go Again' in bold, white letters above them and pink heart symbols in between.

The Growing Call for “Texit”

Texas has again found itself at the epicenter of a dumb and deeply divisive debate, centered around the state’s relationship with the federal government. The right-wing MAGA party is pushing brutal immigration policies and border control to the point where we are back in front of the succession door once again. All hail Lubbock.

The issue reached a boiling point following the Supreme Court’s decision (Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Beer-Me-Bro Kavanaugh dissented.) to allow federal agencies to dismantle parts of a razor-wire barrier erected by Texas along the Mexico border. This decision, coming in a tight 5 to 4 vote, has ignited a fierce reaction among many Texans, who view this as an encroachment upon the state’s right to self-defense and governance.

The US Supreme Court allows US Border Patrol to remove razor wire in Texas along the Rio Grande. The decision is part of an ongoing legal and physical dispute over border security measures. The removal of the razor wire is at the heart of negotiations on border control and immigration policy discussions with the Biden administration.

The Supreme Court’s ruling serves as a flash point in a long-simmering conflict between the state and federal authorities, stirring up all the MAGA crazies in Texas to advocate for secession, popularly referred to as “Texit”.

This sentiment isn’t just a fringe outcry because MAGA is so deeply ingrained in Texan society, including political figures, social media influencers, and grassroots movements like the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM). These groups argue that the federal government’s actions, or inaction, particularly regarding border security, represent a breach of Texas’ sovereignty and constitutional rights.

Governor Greg Abbott, always a central figure when racist bullsh*t is trending out of Texas, has been vocal and assertive in his stance against the federal government’s immigration policies. Abbott has taken unprecedented steps, such as launching “Operation Lone Star” and installing razor wire and saw blades in the Rio Grande, to curb illegal immigration—a move that reflects the state’s deeply xenophobic character while trying to assert authority and fill what it perceives as a void left by federal inaction.

This backdrop again stirs up the same tired debate, not just about immigration and border control but about the broader themes of state sovereignty, federal overreach, and the very nature of the union that constitutes the United States of America.

F’ing Texas again.

The Escalation

The Supreme Court’s ruling did not just stir discontent; it escalated the situation to new heights, moving an ideological battle into action. Abbott’s directive to the Texas National Guard to defend the barbed wire fence, defying the Supreme Court’s ruling, marks a big and potentially dangerous step in the standoff between Texas and the federal government.

This move, backed by 25 Republican governors and regurgitated by blue checks and right-wing political commentators, reflects a growing willingness to challenge federal authority, even to the point of pushing secession.

Graphic of GOP governors supporting Texas border stance.
Credit: Fox News

The situation is made further absurd on what exactly “Texit” would entail. While some Good O’l Boys™ view it as a legitimate and necessary step towards preserving their, yeee haw, state rights and self-governance, most people predict massive economic, legal, and logistical challenges. An independent Texas poses numerous unknown threats to national security and unity, from the loss of federal funding for education, healthcare, and infrastructure to the possible take over of military bases.

The debate around secession is not just a matter of practicality but also of legality and constitutionality. The precedent set by Texas v. White, coupled with the historical context of the Civil War, poses a big o’l legal barrier to any secessionist movement. But, the proponents of “Texit” seem undeterred, driven by a conviction that the state’s right to self-governance and defense, as they interpret it, supersedes all legal constraints.

Texas’ wet dream

As this story unfolds, it’s clear that the standoff is not merely a Texas issue but a national one, raising already settled questions about the balance of power between state and federal authorities, the interpretation of the constitution, and the future of the American union. (Spoiler: the American union isn’t changing any time soon.)

The Path Forward

We all are at a critical juncture with Texas and the sociopathic MAGA governors. While the movement has gained momentum and visibility, it mainly dominates the right-wing media cycles. The Fox News acolytes want a full-scale deployment of the Texas National Guard and continued support from multiple (R) state governors.

Fun fact: The chief of the National Guard Bureau reports to each state governor, but also up to the federal National Guard Bureau, which is part of the U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force, and is led by the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, reporting to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Biden can pull the plug on any Texas National Guard illegality at any time.

The Texas Supreme Court rejected a request from the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM) to intervene after the group’s ballot measure for Texas secession was denied by Republican Party officials. The TNM, which had gathered over 139,000 signatures, sought to place a question on the primary ballot asking if Texas should become an independent nation. The party leaders argued the signatures were submitted late and questioned their validity.

There is really no end in sight to the “Texas Problem” now that 25 more MAGA governors have jumped onto the crazy train. Sadly, what is (purposely) missing in all this excitement about succession, is the acknowledgement about the lives lost in the migration of people from countries the US has systematically made unlivable over the last century.

The focus should be on how to help people relocate and integrate, with migrants and the US both benefiting. There is vast space in the US economy for migrant labor participation if the majority of the US population was not so brutally against the education and employment of migrants, simply due to fearmongering and hate, broadcast in the media on endless repeat.

The Weekend Reader

Weekly Newsletter

Start your weekend informed and entertained.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Difficult Opinions will always publish free content, but I also make my living writing and recording these stories. If you enjoy my work, please consider becoming a member. Thank you!

Previous Article
A collage featuring a woman on the left and several people wearing "Make America Great Again" hats on the right, with the text "Fani vs. Machine" at the top.

Look Away! Pay No Attention to Trump's Crimes

Next Article
Two digital portraits; on the left, a man with a distinctive hairstyle, wearing a hat made of dollar bills, and on the right, a man in a top hat with a U.S. flag design, both in front of patriotic backgrounds.

The War on America

Related Posts
Two individuals are side by side with a robot in the foreground, set against a background of dollar bills. The text "AI = All the Money" is prominently displayed at the top.
Read More

Robinhood Wants AI to Control Your Money

The SEC's proposed "predictive data analytics" rule aims to safeguard investors from risks in the financial sector by controlling the use of AI. But firms like Robinhood, which were fined heavily for misleading customers and violating regulations, have already started the campaign. Elon Musk is also on board, complaining that any form of regulation as a hindrance to their wealth accumulation.
A man wearing glasses looks concerned with one hand on his forehead. Large text reads 'Rudy Confesses' against a purple background.
Read More

Rudy Confesses to Slander

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's former attorney, admitted to making defamatory slander about Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss, two Black Georgia poll workers, during the 2020 election, as part of a lawsuit settlement. The duo had been targeted with conspiracy theories by Giuliani and One America News.
A woman in a black blazer and white shirt with a red 'A' stands beside an illustration of "The Scarlet Letter" book cover, with the text "(R) Doesn't Read" in bold letters on a purple to orange gradient background.
Read More

Republican Doesn’t Read

In a typical display of ignorance, Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) made a dumb spectacle by wearing a white…
A person wearing sunglasses and a suit waves against a pink and blue gradient background with the text "CRIMES CRIMES EVERYWHERE CRIMES."
Read More

Capitol Crime Wave

The report paints a disturbing picture of ethical and criminal misconduct. While Santos has declared his intention to remain in office and fight the charges, he has announced he will not seek reelection. The decision to refer the matter to the DOJ is the right call, but adds yet another layer of complexity to an already anger-filled political US House.